Potential instruction
You tell Scott what happened, the approximate dates and the harm caused. Urgent limitation or evidential issues are identified early.
What to expect
A clear route through
a complex process.
Scott and his team explain the evidence, risks, likely timescale and funding position so that decisions can be made on an informed basis.
Selective assessment
Scott and his team consider whether the matter merits investigation, taking account of clinical merit, proportionality and likely evidential requirements.
Records and expert evidence
Where appropriate, records are reviewed and carefully selected experts address breach of duty, causation, condition and prognosis.
The claim or response
If the evidence supports the case, allegations and losses are presented. In defendant work, the clinical allegations are analysed and answered with precision.
Resolution
The matter may resolve by admission, negotiation or court proceedings. Decisions are made on the evidence, risk and client objectives.
How can a claim be funded?
Conditional fee agreements, legal expenses insurance and private funding may be considered where suitable.
Understand funding →Potential instructionShould Scott consider the matter?
Tell Scott what happened and the team will explain whether an initial assessment is possible.
Speak to Scott →A confidential first step
Speak to Scott about a potential instruction
Scott and his team consider carefully selected clinical negligence matters across England and Wales. If the matter merits investigation, you will receive clear advice on the next step.